The Court of Appeal’s Decision in Muhamad Juzaili bin Mohd Khamis & Ors v State Government of Negeri Sembilan & Ors

A Real Breakthrough in the Law

Authors

  • Khairul Anwar bin Hairudin Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya, Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill
  • Saifullah Qamar Qamar Siddique Bhatti Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya; Fellow, Islamic Renaissance Front.

Keywords:

Juzaili, Navtej, jurisprudence, privacy, laws, rights, individuals, constitutional court, federal, constitution

Abstract

[W]e argue that the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Juzaili is all the more relevant today. It was the Navtej before Navtej. Its reversal by the Federal Court on appeal was erroneous. The judgment of the Court of Appeal ought to therefore remain law till today.
We hope that judges in the future will be inspired to follow the precedent set by the Court of Appeal especially in developing jurisprudence in the field of privacy law. With respect, our judges have to be forward looking and consider the rights of individuals as a whole. They ought not to decide cases relating to fundamental liberties premised on what the society might think of them. The time to act is now. In the words of the majority in Navtej:39
[T]he constitutional courts have to embody in their approach a telescopic vision wherein they inculcate the ability to be futuristic and do not procrastinate till the day when the number of citizens whose fundamental rights are affected and violated grow in figures.
Ultimately, whatever our moral convictions may be, the Federal Constitution remains supreme. It cannot be displaced by persons claiming to hold the moral torch.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Khairul Anwar bin Hairudin, Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya, Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill

The authors have recently published an article arguing that the musahaqah offence and the punishment imposed on the two women (whipping in the presence of the public) are both unconstitutional. That article is entitled “The Constitution and Morality – The Tale of Two Women†and is available online via several web portals on 6 September 2018. See http://irfront.net/post/articles/articles-english/the-constitution-and-morality-the-taleof- two-women/ (original version); https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/441894 (edited version). See also:  https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2018/09/06/saif-bhatti-and-khairul-anwar-hairudin/ last accessed on 22 October 2018.

Saifullah Qamar Qamar Siddique Bhatti, Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya; Fellow, Islamic Renaissance Front.

The authors have recently published an article arguing that the musahaqah offence and the punishment imposed on the two women (whipping in the presence of the public) are both unconstitutional. That article is entitled “The Constitution and Morality – The Tale of Two Women†and is available online via several web portals on 6 September 2018. See http://irfront.net/post/articles/articles-english/the-constitution-and-morality-the-taleof- two-women/ (original version); https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/441894 (edited version). See also:  https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2018/09/06/saif-bhatti-and-khairul-anwar-hairudin/ last accessed on 22 October 2018.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-06

How to Cite

bin Hairudin, K. A., & Qamar Siddique Bhatti, S. Q. (2018). The Court of Appeal’s Decision in Muhamad Juzaili bin Mohd Khamis & Ors v State Government of Negeri Sembilan & Ors: A Real Breakthrough in the Law. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 45(2. Dec), 71–89. Retrieved from http://adum.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/20938

Issue

Vol. 45 No. 2. Dec (2018): Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law

Section

Articles