Main Article Content
Abstract
It was common practice for Muslim conquerors to negotiate pacts and treaties with conquered peoples. These treaties were quite similar in structure and content and reflected a spirit of tolerance towards non-Muslims. They consisted of three main elements: safety for their persons, property, and an assurance of freedom of religion. The simplicity of these agreements changed dramatically with the promulgation of a controversial agreement known as the Banū Taghlib peace treaty. This article is an attempt to present a critical analysis of the historical narratives of Muslim and non-Muslim scholars regarding Banū Taghlib treaty. It will also be an elaboration to the degree of tolerance attributed to Caliph 'Umar. Finally, this article will try to answer the following questions. Were the tribe of Banū Taghlib really exempted from paying the jizyah? Were they prohibited from baptising their children? Is it true that 'Umar instigated those conditions?
Keywords
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
By submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Al-Tamaddun, authors agree to transfer copyright to the journal. However, authors may republish their work or grant others permission to republish it; in which case it should be accompanied by a proper acknowledgment that the work was originally published in the Journal of Al-Tamaddun. The journal adopt CC-BY-NC licence which authors may also share and distribute their article anywhere of non-commercial website, social media and repositories immediately on publication.
Authors may also reuse the Abstract and Citation information (e.g. Title, Author name, Publication dates) of their article anywhere at any time including social media such as Facebook, blogs and Twitter, providing that where possible a link is included back to the article on the journal site.